🔗 Share this article

The leader of Israel Netanyahu might be feeling concerned regarding Zohran Mamdani's resounding success in the November 4th NYC city leadership race. This isn't due to baseless allegations of antisemitism but rather because the new mayor has shattered an established unwritten rule against criticizing Israel's leadership among successful New York elected officials.

Breaking Traditional Patterns

New York City has the biggest Jewish population in the United States – and the second-largest of any city in the world following Tel Aviv. The conventional wisdom suggested that many Jewish constituents prioritized defending Israel's leadership over other issues, so that criticism of Israel could turn away this constituency.

Mamdani thoroughly challenged this assumption. During his campaign he spoke frankly and truthfully about what he called genocidal actions in Gaza. He insisted that all residents in Israel deserve equal rights. He even declared he'd detain the Israeli leader if he visited the city. Despite this, approximately one-third of New York's Jewish electorate voted for him, along with numerous additional voters.

Understanding Voter Support

Certain Jewish constituents might have been uneasy with the mayor's stance on Israel but appreciated other aspects of his agenda, including his persistent emphasis on affordability issues. Others, including the author, were attracted by his honesty on such an important issue. Numerous people were also likely upset by attempts of Mamdani's primary rival to smear him using baseless claims of antisemitism.

After winning, the mayor has maintained his frankness regarding Israel. During a surprisingly friendly meeting with Donald Trump in Washington, Mamdani repeated his position about genocide and pointed out that American taxpayers were supporting these actions. Trump let the comment go without challenge.

Policy Consequences

Following an event where a major NYC temple welcomed an organization encouraging Jewish Americans to emigrate not only to Israel and also to settlements in Palestinian territories, the mayor pointed out the illegality of these settlements. This aligns with Article 49 of humanitarian law, that forbids an occupying power from moving its population to occupied territory.

It's hard to exaggerate how unusual such comments are from a successful New York City political figure.

Broader Political Landscape

This doesn't mean that NYC politicians never question Israel. In March 2024, Chuck Schumer, the Jewish minority leader from Queens, gave a much-discussed address stating that while Israel possesses a right to defend itself, it should minimize harm among Gaza's population. But his language was carefully phrased – far milder compared to the mayor's – and he refused to endorse the candidate even after he secured the party nomination.

Already, Mamdani is drawing other progressive contenders to New York City House elections who are prepared to question Israel and challenge those who don't. Evidently, he has broken the barrier and started a movement.

Broader Implications

We can't compare NYC to the United States as a whole. It is a solidly Democratic and extremely progressive city. Crucially, based on longtime resident experience, much of the Jewish community shares these liberal values. Within more Jewish communities nationwide, there's often more feeling of being threatened and consequently greater backing of Israel as a potential haven from persecution. In New York, Jewish life is part of the city's fabric. The security derived from being a New York Jew often leads to more openness to honest criticism of the Israeli government.

International Context

The political shift on Israel that Mamdani's victory represents should serve as a wake-up call for Israeli leadership. Its conduct in Gaza has turned Israel an international outcast in much of the world. Germany itself temporarily halted weapons exports that could be used in the territory. The UK, Canada, France and Australia recognized a Palestinian state. Israel faces atrocity allegations before the International Court of Justice, and the prime minister and his former defense minister confront atrocity charges before the International Criminal Court for starving and blocking aid to Palestinian civilians. Israel today is overwhelmingly dependent on the defense funding, weapon deals, and diplomatic support of one country: America.

US Political Evolution

This signifies the president holds significant influence. He monitors public opinion. He must see that traditional Israeli advocacy groups are unable to mobilize Jewish votes as successfully as before. He must observe that even his religious conservative base – historically the most reliably pro-Israel voters – are experiencing doubts after Israel's actions in the conflict.

Israel's declining support across America seems to be part of why Trump felt free to impose his Middle East proposal on Netanyahu even though it didn't satisfy all the maximalist demands. The diminishing backing of Israel will certainly affect coming choices as Trump considers whether to insist on a clear pathway for Palestinian statehood, like Middle Eastern are urging. The president will require their assistance to fund rebuilding Gaza and to provide an international peacekeeping mission for the region.

Conclusion: A New Political Reality

That backing Israel isn't anymore mandatory in NYC elections might ultimately signify that it isn't necessary for federal politics. This means good news for Palestinian justice but bad news for the aspirations of Netanyahu and his far-right partners that America will continue overlooking Israel's policies as it tries to settle the Palestinian conflict through genocide, forced deportation, or ongoing segregation.